Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 01:17

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
How do I become an intelligent man?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
PS5 has a huge price advantage over Xbox and Switch 2 right now - Eurogamer
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What are some great short jokes?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
Apple has already fixed iOS 26's biggest design crime - Creative Bloq
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Thank you.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
iOS 26 beta 2 adds brand new iPhone ringtone, listen here - 9to5Mac